"Offensive" is in the Eye of the Beholder

"I published those cartoons to use the maximum freedom allowed..I say to you I published it without reservation …I published it in the most unreasonable manner…whatever offends you, I reserve the right to publish it for whatever offensive reason I want" ( Ezra Levant)

I don't know who could find this "offensive" but obviously sexually, culturally and intellectually retared people do. All I can say is that they better understand that freedom is a two way steet....and grow some thicker skin.

Diversity For Thee But Not For Me

This is a self explanatory snapshot of the diversity inherent in leading edge diversity politics. Above you see the diversity of Canada's globalist social engineering elite's make up. These are the people who dictate race quotas to the Canadian public.

In a normal reasoning civil society, I would not have to comment on the graphic hypocrisy demonstrated by this picture. However we live in an era where public perspective and reason has been drastically warped by the dream scape painted by race/diversity political propaganda.

Normally I would not have to point out that the very administrative cabal which enforces "diversity politics" ( AKA minority inclusion quotas in hiring and institutional make up) is itself drastically deficient of "diversity".

Normally, Canadians would not have to be spoon fed the reality that affirmative action/diversity politics is the invention of the idle white establisment class and is itself a form of "racism" as it deems visible minorities to be at a disadvantage purely because of their color/ethnicity and minority group identifier. This presimes these poor miserable woe-begotten colored things need the help of the white establishment elite to elevate them in socierty as they are obviously incapable of doing so themselves in a "Meritocratic society" due to the obvious inequity they were born with (ie not being a modern white establishment "progressive" social darwinists sensitized to minority inequities).

Normally it would not bear mentioning that identity politics has been the polarizing factor that destroyed nations not congealed them.

Normally, Canadians would not have to be reminded that when an insulated, predominently white ruling class elite embrace racial diversity politics, the resulting dogmatics will be a dystopian morass of guilt complex coping and denial of meritocratic class/color blindness realities.

That is in a normal open liberal democracy...but we have devolved from this into a shrewish jurocratic nanny state where independent critical commentary of modern race politics is deemed to be a hate crime.

And Now For Something Completely Different!

CORRR, YE LIKES A GOOD MEAT PIE THEN DOES YE??

Yes, indeed we does! And here is my personal secret recepe for proper Gumby porter pies:

This yields 4-9” pies or 10-5” pies (adjust quantities as needed ¼ =1 - 9” or 3 -5” pies)

500ml Fuller’s porter or a dark bock or a malty stout (malty black beer low on hops)
1lb lean ground beef
1lb ground pork
3-4 cups of finely diced portabellos or a combo of portobello and crimini Mushrooms
2 –3 large cloves of garlic (minced)
2 large red shallots diced chopped
1 medium yellow onion chopped fine
1 or 11/2 large potato (coarse grated)
2 medium Carrots (coarse grated)
4 slices of bacon (diced)
1 cup 10-14% cream
1 Package dry onion soup mix
2 tbsp liquid Bovril ( or ad another half packet onion soup)
11/2-2 tblsp Worcestershire sauce
Hot or piquant paprika to taste (about ¾ tsp)
Couple dashes of hot sauce or pepper to taste
salt to taste
A Pinch or two of celery seed
A pinch or two of marjoram
2 egg whites
3 Tbsp olive oil
1 tsp basil pesto
1-3 tbsp flour ( I use the fine “sauce” flour in the shaker)

Pasty:
4 pie shells and 4 pilsbury pie pastry tops
or
Scratch Pastry:

(Makes pastry for 1-9” pie crust top and bottom)
2 1/2 cups all-purpose flour
1 1/2 tablespoons sugar
1 1/4 teaspoons salt
2/3 cup vegetable shortening, cut into 1/2-inch pieces
1/2 cup chilled unsalted butter or margarine
6 tablespoons chilled malty lager
2 teaspoons wine vinegar

1. Blend flour, sugar and salt in processor.
2. Add shortening and butter and chop-mix until mixture resembles coarse meal.
3. Transfer mixture to bowl.
4. Mix 6 tablespoons beer and vinegar in small bowl; pour over flour mixture.
5. Stir with fork until moist clumps form, adding more beer by teaspoonfuls if dough is dry.
6. Gather dough into 2 balls; roll each into disk
7. place one in pie pan reserve other for top crust

Method:

1) Prep all the diced and grated ingredients first.
2) Brown the meat in a skillet with a few onions and garlic, drain this meat when browned through a colander and put aside ( save drippings)
3) Put the diced bacon in a fry pan and sweat the grease from it
4) When the pan has some bacon drippings add a bit of the meat drippings as needed to sauté the mushrooms and onion
5) When onion is translucent and mushrooms is getting soft , add the drained meat to the pan
6) Blend meat mushroom and onion with rest of the garlic- add the beer and cream and stir.
7) When this is bubbling add the Bovril, onion soup and let simmer for 5 min
8) Add the grated carrot and potato and remaining spices, mix, then put a lid on the pan and let slow simmer for 15 min adding water (or Beer) if/as needed to keep a 10% liquid content.
9) Adjust seasoning if needed, bring to a rolling simmer and add flour as needed to make the mixture a thick pie-filling consistency.
10) Ladle meat mixture into prepared pastry-lined pans and put top crusts in place.
11) Mix the egg yolk, olive oil and basil pesto in a cup whisk to bend, brush on top crust and score (perforate) top crust
12) Place pies in pans on middle rack of oven at 375 deg.F. for 30-40 min or until top crust is flaky and browned

Notes:

• I use a large electric fry-pan for this but any large skillet that can contain the total ingredients and be covered is OK
• ¼ the ingredient list for 1-9” pie or 3-5” pies and then the pastry recipe will do you without multiplying it
• The cream is essential…you may balk at putting cream and beer in the same pan put believe me it makes the finished product unique and well worth while.
• The store-bought pastry is faster, easy to use and tasted just as good. Try to find the Pillsbury refrigerated pie crusts, they are great for this and especially good for making smaller 5” pies because the trims can be rolled and reused to make more crusts Sobeys usually has this in the dairy case next to the Pillsbury croissants.

Comments:
This malty confection makes the best savoury meat pies I ever tasted…and I don’t like pastry but this is pure ambrosia to the palate and well into the “comfort food” genre. Served with a tall tankard of crafted ale this is a meal fit to savor as Rome burns around you.

Transnationalist Agenda For Global Federation Not A New Concept

"Subdue yourselves to the federation of the world"
- ( H.G.Wells)

H.G. Wells is probably renown in modern culture as the father of science fiction. “War of the Worlds“, "The Time Machine" and other of his novels were transformed into modern Hollywood horror genre epics. Selectively culled from popular culture info on Wells, is that he authored numerous books and essays which were not of the science fiction genre.They were distinctly social-political in nature and are distinguished from is sci-fi thrillers by the distasteful social Darwinist elitism they convey. The “New World Order“, and the “Open Conspiracy” are two notable pieces of social political commentary that Wells produced.

Wells wrote the first edition of “The Open Conspiracy” in 1928. This book details what Wells called the “Open Conspiracy” among the intellectual and political class elites of the day who despised the old order of things (most notably the sovereign nation state and commoner influence in law and government). He was made privy to their desire to work towards a grand world directorate, a global society in which individuals no longer hold fast to tradition, but yield themselves willingly to the world state for the good of all. This agenda was particularly popular with his contempories like George Bernard Shaw, the Huxleys, Darwins, Wedgewoods and Clement Attlee to name a few in the Fabian society. Wells' "Open Conspiracy" utilizes propaganda, educational and governmental reform, and other forms of influence to advance the goals of its author . The scientific management of the world (martial technocracy) is at the heart of the open conspirators agenda. Of course, this rigid, top down, elitist management of humanity is sold as being for the benefit of all. As in all autocratic schemes it is always the elite controlling class which receive the bulk of the "benefits".

Population control through genetic culturing and eugenics is named by Wells in the Open Conspiracy as a “primary condition” of the world directorate. Wells writes,

“There is a clear hope that, later, directed breeding will come within his [mankind’s] scope, but that goes beyond his present range of practical achievement, and we need not discuss it further here. Suffice it for us here that the world community of our desires, the organized world community conducting and ensuring its own progress, requires a deliberate collective control of population as a primary condition.

We want watchful and understanding guardians and drivers of complex delicate machines, which can be mishandled and brutalized and spoilt all too easily. The less disposed these masters of our machines are to inordinate multiplication, the more room and food in the world for their ampler lives. Even to the lowest level of a fully-mechanicalized civilization it is required that the human element should be select.”

A succinct and candid summary of Wells’ idea of a centrally federated global regime can be found in the introduction that he wrote for prominent eugenicist Margaret Sanger in her book “Pivot of Civilization“, written in 1922. Wells speaks with an authoritarian and elitist tone in condemning the world for misusing the “gifts” that the elite have so kindly presented to mankind. He transposes these appalling thoughts to words;

“The New Civilization is saying to the Old now: “We cannot go on making power for you to spend upon international conflict. You must stop waving flags and bandying insults. You must organize the Peace of the World; you must subdue yourselves to the Federation of all mankind. And we cannot go on giving you health, freedom, enlargement, limitless wealth, if all our gifts to you are to be swamped by an indiscriminate torrent of progeny. We want fewer and better children who can be reared up to their full possibilities in unencumbered homes, and we cannot make the social life and the world-peace we are determined to make, with the ill-bred, ill-trained swarms of inferior citizens that you inflict upon us.”

With this one paragraph, Wells succeeds in presenting the full intent of population control: total domination.

So we see the elements expressed by modern transnationalists in the environmental, resource sustainability and global corporatism cliques running the UN NGOs, being expressed by the archetype Tranzies in Wells' era. Those being: central planning and control of populations, economies, resources...everything, including the population, becomes the communal property of the global state under fiefdom of a central governing elite. There is no room for individualism, democracy or commoner input into the policy making mechanisms of this "federation".

Almost 100 years after Wells and the Fabian and Rhodes round table transnationalists, we see their ideals entrenched in a modern Tranzi "stonehenge"...which is in reality a tombstone for individual rights, personal and national independence and the nation state that protects these out moded machinations of the "old order".

Carved in stone it reads:

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
10.Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.

9 in 10 people will have to vanish from the earth to bring about this transnational "Utopia".

"Liberal Fascism" At Play In Canadian Current Events

Fascism: is an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a moral cause) which considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the technocratic state, party or society as a whole. Fascists seek to forge a type of national political and ideological conformity, usually through the vehicle of autocratic national governing cliques and rigid administrative committees and agencies. Fascism uses administrative tyranny exercised to produce conformity to political and economic policy.

If you want to remain blissfully ignorant of the nastier forces at play in Canadian politics and current events then DON'T buy Jonah Goldberg's latest book: "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning". Reading this is akin to taking the "red pill" in the Matrix movies....you'll never view left of center politics the same after reading this.

The cover sports a "happy face" adorned with a Hitler-esque moustache....a most apropos symbolism for the policy sightings contained in the book. Happy-face despotism engendered in Lib-left orthodoxies is quite evident once you know what to look for. This book is your field guide to Lib-watching so you can identify the prolific species of new liberal which hopes to line it's 21st century utopian nest with the old twigs of failed 20th century political administrative despotism...better known as national socialism or statist socialism or doctrinaire fascism. All are the same brand of oppressive top down government administrative regimes which the neo-Liberal dogmatist admires for its technocratic efficiency in getting a statist agenda accomplished with a minimum of public opinion/backlash/obstruction.

As a reader of this book, and now an educated Liberal species watcher, I saw the proponents of "Liberal fascism" in full swing the last few weeks.

First and most vivid a display of Canadian "liberal fascism", was the CHRC abuses of free speech and free press recently brought to light. The proponents of Liberal democratic civil liberty lined up on one side and the proponents of the new "Liberal fascism" lined up on the side of their instrument of state censorship and public repression.

Then we see the the mindset of the "liberal fascism" as the section 13 defenders violently defame and attack their opponents and threaten law suits against anyone who disagrees with them. We see them in credibility melt down as they become more underhanded, craven, petty and vindictive . They desperately grasp at straws to save their institutionalized fascist administration systems being exposed to the wider scrutiny of open public debate of a bill to reform their institutionalized censorship and public intimidation.

Then we see one of Liberaldom's environmental evangelists David Suzuki (AKA Dr. Fruit Fly) expose his despotic underbelly in a foamy-mouthed sermon in which he denounces liberal democracy and advocates for an elitist technocracy run by scientists like himself who could call for the incarceration of anyone who dissents from their presumed infallible theories.

The last three weeks may seem like just another bout of "silly season" in Canadian politics but for the educated observer it was an open display of unseemly Liberal fascism. Liberal activism has never looked the same since taking the red pill. It is an eye opener to see what lurks behind a swastika these days.

From Marxists to Transnational Progressives: A look at the left's slow, mutated journey to the New World Order

“Transnational progressivism”…now there’s a jawbreaker to pronounce and a head-banger to conceptualize. First time I heard it mentioned on a political blog, I shrugged it off as just another vacant academic toss-off phrase that must’ve discharged from some nameless cloistered elite mind-farting in public. Then I came across this article by John Fonte

Fonte observes that elite institutions in western culture from the national council of churches to the UN and it's plethora of NGOs are embarked upon an active path to destroy the concept of the sovereign nation state and it's empowered individual and displace the influenece of the elected governments of these separate sovereign states with regional or global regulatory bureaucracies. He also observed that for some unknown reason all the governments in these sovereign western free nation-states seem on a self destructive course in being determined to deliver themselves up to this weakened national sovereignty and transnational governance. Fonte published his observations in the summer 2002 edition of the Hudson Institute Orbis magazine.

A profound observation by Mr. Carr. The collective dogmatic left has indeed grown up and left it;s small domestic pond and gone international in scope. Mutated from revolutionary tadpoles to mammon monopolisers and bureaucratic moguls in agenda and as such have attracted an economic and political elite to the helm of the movement. This new international leftist elite (transnational progressivist or “Tranzies”) to whom the acquisition of both power and wealth has been a generational quest, have taken up the cause of the old left and sculpted the new global left ideologies to fit their long term agendas. Gone is the economic class struggle of Marx as the new middle class tyranny of a global bureaucratic feudal elite emerges from the old revolutionary left populist crusades. But this was destined to be....an natural off-shoot of communism becoming populist in postmodernist western culture and going global in scope.

Communism, or more accurately centralized socialism, is not a movement of the down-trodden masses but of the economic elite….the natural extension of this is global socialism which the “Tranzies” promote. If one understands that socialism is NOT a share the wealth plan but a politically actuated plan to consolidate power and control a nation’s wealth, then the paradox of super rich men promoting global socialism (or transnational progressivism) becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes logical, even the perfect tool for wealthy power-seeking megalomaniacs.

What we have to see when viewing the machinations and ideals of the new left/”Tranzie” movement, is that two historic polar opposite philosophies have found common ground in a common control agenda. In the past, the radical left was always defined by it’s big government interventionist statism... its trend toward police state enforcement of dyslexic utopian egalitarianism…in contrast, the radical right was defined by it's big business-corporatist-monopolist economic feudalism and social darwinism...its tendency to politically empower a economic elite and form economic feudalist “baronage” among silent ruling class oligarchs…in the transnational progressivist movement there are elements of both these radical agendas in a convenient practical marriage. That ideological “marriage" has made the Tranzie movement the most formidable danger free men have faced since escaping the tyranny of the age of Kings. The danger lies in the common element glueing these global control orthodoxies is the disempowerment of the individual. The age of the comman man is at a wane....the rise of NGO regulatory pwer is the symptomatic evidence and return to the empowered idividual is the cure to keep unaccountable global autocrats at bay...the empowered individual thrives in the soveriegn constitutional-commonlaw nation state.

The coming global administration will be no respecter of your individual or civil freedoms. From the behavior of Tranzies in domestic office today we can see they are headed towards some form of racialist police state being imposed (Multicult/diversity enforcement being a machination of “Tranzie” statism). A state where the elites will encourage the supposed historically oppressed to get even with their former oppressors and provide that opportunity through the perversion of the legal and governing systems will/has emerged...a sort of defacto tyranny of minorieites supported by a white-bread ruling elite.

This is the first installment on the transnational progressivist globalism…

....coming up next we will explore this pluralist “group rights” concept of “Tranzism” being the antithesis of constitutional democracy concepts of the individual being the central political unit:

“Among the main concepts of Transnational Progressivism is the notion that the key political unit is not the individual who forms voluntary associations and works with his fellow citizens regardless of their race, sex or national origin, it is the ascriptive group – racial, ethnic or gender – into which one is born.”

Political landscape: How it really lays out

I have been doing a lot of blog hopping and commenting lately to political blogs of all stripes. I keep seeing a singularly insideous phenomina reoccuring in most of these blogs posts. That being: the use of political brand labeling and the old ( discredited) "left-right" political spectrum map.

I have written enough about how I have come to realize that political labels and the old left-right/Tory-Liberal/Republican-Democrat partisan tribalism is a mistake and no longer applicable to the homogeneous politics at play in all branded parties......the ideologies and mindsets that drive politics today defy the currrent labeling and certainly are more complex that the simple 2 dimensional Left-right spectrum.

As I see it, political ideologies reflect 7 distinct groups of thought that I will briefly list here on a scale that measues practical governing diligence of these political camps as they relate to mindset and end results....so they are listed here with the most repressive at the top to the most free and the bottom:

Type 1:
"Classic Imperilist" (Imperial Rome, European Kindoms, Aristocracy, modern globaism):
I am chosen by birth right and divine destiny to rule over the soiled masses and have them do my bidding, till my fields, fight my wars of expansion and service the needs of the nobility class I create to uphold my absolute authority. My whim and will is not to be questioned, it is the extention of divine provedence. The greed, averice, corruption and profligacy of my ilk is above the law.

Type 2:
" Revolutionary" ( Terrorist/anarchist/ Marxist/): Personal trama has caused an abnormal personality disorder in me. I spend most of my waking hours focusing my hatred and anger from this past event upon a percieved "political" enemy and wrapping my uncivil criminal and violent agenda in a sanitizing cloak of "a people's political cause". The immediate result of my revolution ranges from social deconstruction and balkanization to anarchy and genocide. The governments I may form rely on fear, intimidation and tyranny to control dissent to my authority. Revolutionary "leaders" share the megalomania of "type 1" autocrats.

Type 3:
" socialist" ( Libber-Dipper) : I am basically a sociopathic elitist and have resentment and contempt for most people…this is why I support a party/dogma that treats them all like the stupid greedy children they are. If I can avoid common donkeywork and feather my own nest by organizing/engineering the lives of these hopeless cattle my philosophical goals are met. If I can portray my base instincts and anti-social agendas as moral superiority and be exalted as a commoner's demigod, my intellectual needs are met.

Type 4:
“Progressive” (Conservative/Liberal): We condemn these elitist social engineering policy assumptions of public retardation and dependence on patronizing subsidy, however we support all the government programs which use them as a basic assumption….besides big government = job security for the unproductive political class (progressives).

Type 5:
Populist (CPC) : I have always felt disempowered and want a say. If folks vote for big Gummint and Kleptocratic welfare statism folks should get big Gummint and Kleptocratic welfare statism, as long as it’s ratified by the majority and we get to look over the cooked books once in a while. A democratic majority can justify anything. As long as democratic process is served the mob rules...no matter what it is they want.

Type 6:
"Libertarian" (Classic Liberals; JS Mill, Friedrich Hayek, Ludwig von Mises, and Milton Friedman) : I have been directly deprived of property and prosperity by the actions of large out of control government. Therefore I believe the government which governs least governs best , the sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the individual citizen in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property, and when the government assumes other functions it is usurpation and oppression. Three groups spend other people's money: children, thieves, and politicians. All three need close supervision and accountability.

Type 7:
"Constitutionalist" (free patriots, Andrew Jackson, William Lyon Mackenzie ): I have suffered personal loss from government greed and corruption. I realize fear is the foundation of most governments, and the law and constitution must limit the amount of coercive fear a government can hold over its constituents. People should not be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people. When government fears the people we have civil democracy when people fear the government we have statist tyranny. A publicly accountable executive bureaucracy and judiciary and the civilian right to arms and self defense are the best insurance against tyranny of the state.

We have not seen "type 1" for some time but disciples to this political belief system do survive today and they have gravitated to global political policy organizations which have undue influence on sovereign free state government....CFR, Trilateral, Bilberberg groups, Club of Rome, UN policy committees...all good examples of the type 1 political personality.

Type 2 pretty much ran it's course in the early and mid 20th century and its 2 largest experiments failed and now embrace mid- 19th century "robber baron" ologopolist capitalism. We see "romantics" in the decadent American and European urban landscapes keep the romance of the revolutionaries alive in Campus fringe politics and far left social causes. Castro refuses to die but when he does Cuba will follow Russia and China into corrupted globalist capitalism...that leaves us Kim in Koera and his pals in the Islamic Jihadi movements as type 2 proponents...their Mullahs are losing ground daily to western liberalism.

In North America we had our nations founded by type 7 and 6 politics but have degenerated to types 5, 4 and 3 as particapatory democracy declines and accountability of government is obscured by the expansion of the centralized mega-state and the limited information from a controlled corporate media. Type 6and 7 politics arises mostly in patriotic fringe politics these days which the decadent and corrupt power brokers of type 3,4,5 politics would dearly like to falsely label as a type 2 "terrorism" and purge from the political landscape in North America....it is a sad statement on North American decline that we have devolved from Libertarian Constitutionalists into populist-socialist-progressives who see the nation's founding principles as "dangerous".

So in summary all politics in play in modern governnace these days fit one or a combination of the 7 types of state craft. It is statecraft we see at the street level NOT Partisan politics...it is political brand loyalty hokum and partisan roll playing we see in the public political theater...it is a branded, packaged product of manipulative tribalizing bunk...all practial applications of politics at play in Canadian governing show a mixture of types 3 through 5 which spreads widely throughout the party system...there is no pure conservative, liberal or socialist party.....they have elements of type 3/4/5 in all parties.....that is how vastly compromised politics have become in the modern super state..

..the result is our democracies are becoming stagnated and politically inbred by a defacto single party state that hands off leaders in an election every 4 years.