Warm Up a Jail Cell for "the natural governing party".
Here's a little reminder that we have criminals at large and unapprehended sitting in office. My Criminal code section 119 reads this way:
119. (1) Every one who
(a) being the holder of a judicial office, or being a member of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, corruptly
(i) accepts or obtains,
(ii) agrees to accept, or
(iii) attempts to obtain,any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment for himself or another person in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by him in his official capacity, or
(b) gives or offers, corruptly, to a person mentioned in paragraph (a) any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by him in his official capacity for himself or another person,is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
The Martin/Chretien government has received millions of dollars in kickbacks for diverting hundreds of millions of dollars to government friendly advertising firms, who did little or no work in return. They have been openly caught offering bribes to opposition members for support. The auditor has turned up dozens of cases of breach of the tendering system where patronage superceded statute law requirement for open tender and best bid. Liberal party caucus members openly conspired with organized crime figures to breech public trust. Judges have been proven to be co-opted into this bribery scheme through patronage office appointments. As we can see in Criminal code sections 120 121and 124, even the underlings and party workers are liable for criminal charges:
120. Every one who
(a) being a justice, police commissioner, peace officer, public officer or officer of a juvenile court, or being employed in the administration of criminal law, corruptly
(i) accepts or obtains,
(ii) agrees to accept, or
(iii) attempts to obtain,
for himself or any other person any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment with intent
(iv) to interfere with the administration of justice,
(v) to procure or facilitate the commission of an offence, or
(vi) to protect from detection or punishment a person who has committed or who intends to commit an offence, or
(b) gives or offers, corruptly, to a person mentioned in paragraph (a) any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment with intent that the person should do anything mentioned in subparagraph (a)(iv), (v) or (vi),
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
Frauds on the government
121. (1) Every one commits an offence who
(a) directly or indirectly
(i) gives, offers or agrees to give or offer to an official or to any member of his family, or to any one for the benefit of an official, or
(ii) being an official, demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept from any person for himself or another person,
a loan, reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for cooperation, assistance, exercise of influence or an act or omission in connection with
(iii) the transaction of business with or any matter of business relating to the government, or
(iv) a claim against Her Majesty or any benefit that Her Majesty is authorized or is entitled to bestow,
whether or not, in fact, the official is able to cooperate, render assistance, exercise influence or do or omit to do what is proposed, as the case may be;
(b) having dealings of any kind with the government, pays a commission or reward to or confers an advantage or benefit of any kind on an employee or official of the government with which he deals, or to any member of his family, or to any one for the benefit of the employee or official, with respect to those dealings, unless he has the consent in writing of the head of the branch of government with which he deals, the proof of which lies on him;
(c) being an official or employee of the government, demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept from a person who has dealings with the government a commission, reward, advantage or benefit of any kind directly or indirectly, by himself or through a member of his family or through any one for his benefit, unless he has the consent in writing of the head of the branch of government that employs him or of which he is an official, the proof of which lies on him;
(d) having or pretending to have influence with the government or with a minister of the government or an official, demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept for himself or another person a reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for cooperation, assistance, exercise of influence or an act or omission in connection with
(i) anything mentioned in subparagraph (a)(iii) or (iv), or
(ii) the appointment of any person, including himself, to an office;
(e) gives, offers or agrees to give or offer to a minister of the government or an official a reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for cooperation, assistance, exercise of influence or an act or omission in connection with
(i) anything mentioned in subparagraph (a)(iii) or (iv), or
(ii) the appointment of any person, including himself, to an office; or
(f) having made a tender to obtain a contract with the government
(i) gives, offers or agrees to give or offer to another person who has made a tender or to a member of his family, or to another person for the benefit of that person, a reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for the withdrawal of the tender of that person, or
(ii) demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept from another person who has made a tender a reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for the withdrawal of his tender.
Contractor subscribing to election fund
(2) Every one commits an offence who, in order to obtain or retain a contract with the government, or as a term of any such contract, whether express or implied, directly or indirectly subscribes or gives, or agrees to subscribe or give, to any person any valuable consideration
(a) for the purpose of promoting the election of a candidate or a class or party of candidates to Parliament or the legislature of a province; or
(b) with intent to influence or affect in any way the result of an election conducted for the purpose of electing persons to serve in Parliament or the legislature of a province.
Punishment
(3) Every one who commits an offence under this section is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
Breach of trust by public officer
122. Every official who, in connection with the duties of his office, commits fraud or a breach of trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person.
124. Every one who
(a) purports to sell or agrees to sell an appointment to or a resignation from an office, or a consent to any such appointment or resignation, or receives or agrees to receive a reward or profit from the purported sale thereof, or
(b) purports to purchase or gives a reward or profit for the purported purchase of any such appointment, resignation or consent, or agrees or promises to do so,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
Of course the Librano PMO tactics were to have lakey's and party henchmen do the actual crimes so they are one person removed from the direct act. However there is a case to be made through the revelations of the Gomery witnesses which reveals these criminal acts were done by people in the direct reporting chain to sitting politicians. That is called criminal conspiracy:
465. (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy:
(a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;
(b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an alleged offence, knowing that he did not commit that offence, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
(i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life or for a term not exceeding fourteen years, or
(ii) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to imprisonment for less than fourteen years;
(c) every one who conspires with any one to commit an indictable offence not provided for in paragraph (a) or (b) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to the same punishment as that to which an accused who is guilty of that offence would, on conviction, be liable;
467.11 (1) Every person who, for the purpose of enhancing the ability of a criminal organization to facilitate or commit an indictable offence under this or any other Act of Parliament, knowingly, by act or omission, participates in or contributes to any activity of the criminal organization is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
Overt criminality is not a desirous standard for a system government in a supposed democratic nation. The reaction of this criminal cartel is to use the low expectaion argument that all political parties are corrupt then proceed to use their concubine, the MSM, to demonize anyone demanding action against this criminal behaviour.....and to hypnotize the public into accepting this criminality as "normal".
This Canadian is fed up. I want action! After Gomery tables the compiled evibence I want charges brought forward and the guilty parties tried under section 119..then jailed if guilty. The end of political elitism and escape from the rule of law HAS ENDED!!
I call for a citizen's committee to demand (by petition) that criminal acts and perpetrators in the Adscam investigation be tried for criminal conspiracy and criminal breach of office as per the criminal code section 119. It will be the citizens who must drive this as the flunky put in charge of follow up from Gomery ( Stronach) is herself an actor in a criminal conspiricy bribery plot.
Who's with me on this
119. (1) Every one who
(a) being the holder of a judicial office, or being a member of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, corruptly
(i) accepts or obtains,
(ii) agrees to accept, or
(iii) attempts to obtain,any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment for himself or another person in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by him in his official capacity, or
(b) gives or offers, corruptly, to a person mentioned in paragraph (a) any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by him in his official capacity for himself or another person,is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
The Martin/Chretien government has received millions of dollars in kickbacks for diverting hundreds of millions of dollars to government friendly advertising firms, who did little or no work in return. They have been openly caught offering bribes to opposition members for support. The auditor has turned up dozens of cases of breach of the tendering system where patronage superceded statute law requirement for open tender and best bid. Liberal party caucus members openly conspired with organized crime figures to breech public trust. Judges have been proven to be co-opted into this bribery scheme through patronage office appointments. As we can see in Criminal code sections 120 121and 124, even the underlings and party workers are liable for criminal charges:
120. Every one who
(a) being a justice, police commissioner, peace officer, public officer or officer of a juvenile court, or being employed in the administration of criminal law, corruptly
(i) accepts or obtains,
(ii) agrees to accept, or
(iii) attempts to obtain,
for himself or any other person any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment with intent
(iv) to interfere with the administration of justice,
(v) to procure or facilitate the commission of an offence, or
(vi) to protect from detection or punishment a person who has committed or who intends to commit an offence, or
(b) gives or offers, corruptly, to a person mentioned in paragraph (a) any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment with intent that the person should do anything mentioned in subparagraph (a)(iv), (v) or (vi),
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
Frauds on the government
121. (1) Every one commits an offence who
(a) directly or indirectly
(i) gives, offers or agrees to give or offer to an official or to any member of his family, or to any one for the benefit of an official, or
(ii) being an official, demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept from any person for himself or another person,
a loan, reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for cooperation, assistance, exercise of influence or an act or omission in connection with
(iii) the transaction of business with or any matter of business relating to the government, or
(iv) a claim against Her Majesty or any benefit that Her Majesty is authorized or is entitled to bestow,
whether or not, in fact, the official is able to cooperate, render assistance, exercise influence or do or omit to do what is proposed, as the case may be;
(b) having dealings of any kind with the government, pays a commission or reward to or confers an advantage or benefit of any kind on an employee or official of the government with which he deals, or to any member of his family, or to any one for the benefit of the employee or official, with respect to those dealings, unless he has the consent in writing of the head of the branch of government with which he deals, the proof of which lies on him;
(c) being an official or employee of the government, demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept from a person who has dealings with the government a commission, reward, advantage or benefit of any kind directly or indirectly, by himself or through a member of his family or through any one for his benefit, unless he has the consent in writing of the head of the branch of government that employs him or of which he is an official, the proof of which lies on him;
(d) having or pretending to have influence with the government or with a minister of the government or an official, demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept for himself or another person a reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for cooperation, assistance, exercise of influence or an act or omission in connection with
(i) anything mentioned in subparagraph (a)(iii) or (iv), or
(ii) the appointment of any person, including himself, to an office;
(e) gives, offers or agrees to give or offer to a minister of the government or an official a reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for cooperation, assistance, exercise of influence or an act or omission in connection with
(i) anything mentioned in subparagraph (a)(iii) or (iv), or
(ii) the appointment of any person, including himself, to an office; or
(f) having made a tender to obtain a contract with the government
(i) gives, offers or agrees to give or offer to another person who has made a tender or to a member of his family, or to another person for the benefit of that person, a reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for the withdrawal of the tender of that person, or
(ii) demands, accepts or offers or agrees to accept from another person who has made a tender a reward, advantage or benefit of any kind as consideration for the withdrawal of his tender.
Contractor subscribing to election fund
(2) Every one commits an offence who, in order to obtain or retain a contract with the government, or as a term of any such contract, whether express or implied, directly or indirectly subscribes or gives, or agrees to subscribe or give, to any person any valuable consideration
(a) for the purpose of promoting the election of a candidate or a class or party of candidates to Parliament or the legislature of a province; or
(b) with intent to influence or affect in any way the result of an election conducted for the purpose of electing persons to serve in Parliament or the legislature of a province.
Punishment
(3) Every one who commits an offence under this section is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
Breach of trust by public officer
122. Every official who, in connection with the duties of his office, commits fraud or a breach of trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person.
124. Every one who
(a) purports to sell or agrees to sell an appointment to or a resignation from an office, or a consent to any such appointment or resignation, or receives or agrees to receive a reward or profit from the purported sale thereof, or
(b) purports to purchase or gives a reward or profit for the purported purchase of any such appointment, resignation or consent, or agrees or promises to do so,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
Of course the Librano PMO tactics were to have lakey's and party henchmen do the actual crimes so they are one person removed from the direct act. However there is a case to be made through the revelations of the Gomery witnesses which reveals these criminal acts were done by people in the direct reporting chain to sitting politicians. That is called criminal conspiracy:
465. (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy:
(a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for life;
(b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an alleged offence, knowing that he did not commit that offence, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
(i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life or for a term not exceeding fourteen years, or
(ii) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, if the alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to imprisonment for less than fourteen years;
(c) every one who conspires with any one to commit an indictable offence not provided for in paragraph (a) or (b) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to the same punishment as that to which an accused who is guilty of that offence would, on conviction, be liable;
467.11 (1) Every person who, for the purpose of enhancing the ability of a criminal organization to facilitate or commit an indictable offence under this or any other Act of Parliament, knowingly, by act or omission, participates in or contributes to any activity of the criminal organization is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
Overt criminality is not a desirous standard for a system government in a supposed democratic nation. The reaction of this criminal cartel is to use the low expectaion argument that all political parties are corrupt then proceed to use their concubine, the MSM, to demonize anyone demanding action against this criminal behaviour.....and to hypnotize the public into accepting this criminality as "normal".
This Canadian is fed up. I want action! After Gomery tables the compiled evibence I want charges brought forward and the guilty parties tried under section 119..then jailed if guilty. The end of political elitism and escape from the rule of law HAS ENDED!!
I call for a citizen's committee to demand (by petition) that criminal acts and perpetrators in the Adscam investigation be tried for criminal conspiracy and criminal breach of office as per the criminal code section 119. It will be the citizens who must drive this as the flunky put in charge of follow up from Gomery ( Stronach) is herself an actor in a criminal conspiricy bribery plot.
Who's with me on this
posted by W.L. Mackenzie Redux | 7:23 AM
14 Comments:
Thanks for posting this Bill. Isn't it interesting that the shitstorm created by the MSM and the Liberals surrounding Grewal, managed to remove the culprits from public scrutiny. I am amazed at how many people want Grewal's head, and have forgotten the Liberal members of that mess.
Both Murphy and Dosanjh were guilty of breaking all 4 criminal code statutes...the fact they directly implicated Martin and related that this was done before also brings PM the PM into the realm of criminal conspiritor.
The whole nest of vipers in the Liberal caucus should be thoroughly investigated and charged ...then recieve jail time and the criminal record they so justly deserve.....I suppose the Liberals hate two tiers unless it's the 2 tiered justice system that absolves political elites from criminal indemnity for their crimes.
OK. Where's the petition? Where do I sign?
Aizlynne: Yes I do. I have run both constitutional challenges and charter challenges. You are right...access to charter/constitutional justice is restrictive for the individual...about $40K to get to the SCC.
Something like you and I are talking about can be carried off by a small group of patriots spread across the nation and with a little help from thenCPC and local media we can get enough signatures on a petition and raise enough stink in the alternate media that we will not be ignored.
We are simply demanding that the same justice that holds us accountable to the law be applied equitably ( as in Charter section 15 guarantee) to politicians and political elites who have proken the law.
The Gomery final filing of findings will not be an indictable document....it will provide enough evidence to warrant a police investigation into criminal acts and if the investigations turn up evidence we expect appropriate criminal charges and penaties to be dealt to the law breakers....that includes Mr. Dithers and former crooks from Chretien's PMO ( as well as the Cretch himself)
This is a citizen's demand that charter guaranteed fundamental justice and due process be extended to political elites...particularly those who operate outside the scope of the criminal code in their dealings.
Anonymous said...
OK. Where's the petition? Where do I sign?
are you going to sign as anonymous? We have to see what Gomery publishes then demand that Belinda seek police investigations and prosecutions of criminal acts.
The day I get the finalized report I will fill in the premise and preamble of the petition and put in circulation to those who want to be accountable for the copies they fill.
There are legal requirements for the size, and format of a petiton and the manner in which it is signed....it must be micro managed by the person obtaining signatures....a sad fact of modern Canadian civics is that most people have no idea what the proper and leagal requirements are for signing a petition.
These are small details we can iron out with a process shet that can accomany the petition. Prior to the gung ho rush, a successful petition requires planning and strategy. I'm open to anyone who want's to volunteer as a regional coordinator for this petition circulation....contact me by e-mail.
I'm with you.
But WHO PRECISELY will bring the charges against and prosecute the appropriate members of the government? After all, it seems to me that all agencies of the state, including law enforcement and the courts, seem to be taking their cue only from the Libs. I must admit this is an area in which I'm not all that well-informed.
After all, if the Lib gov't is as crooked as we know it to be, wouldn't the appropriate authority already have gone after them? Surely the bums can't literally be above the law?
Ah, I just read what you said, Bill, directly above my previous comment. I was pressed for time then, but all is calm now.
Wow! You have an excellent plan here! It is something I've long been wondering would ever be done. I'll sign the petition for sure!
Apparently bringing a government to justice in Canada for criminal wrongdoing is a tad more complicated than registering one's car.
This undertaking, of which you speak, to push for the prosecution of those responsible for the wrongs upon which Judge Gomery will (hopefully; first gotta tell Johnny Cretin that he can't have everything he wants anymore) render a report will perhaps be an exciting historical event. I am hoping that, however it must be done and by whom, it will succeed.
And I hope that the SCOC will do the right thing and that it is never under any influence from any agent of the government. It must.
Forgive me, Bill, if sometimes it looks as though I haven't read everything before commenting. Time is a luxury that comes and goes as it will and sometimes makes all of us have a brainfart...
Bill; let's not underestimate the role of the MSM in distracting the public from the "law" involved in the Grewal mess. I used it as an example today in a post, along with your post here, because the average Canadian forgot very quickly about PMPM and his band of thugs once the MSM got its teeth into Grewal. Grewal, unfortunately, was an easy target. I'll have to quote Anne Coulter again. " the only way you win against Liberals is to be perfect... because they have the media and will exploit even the tinies fault!"
And even if your perfect they will maqnufacture something against you.
Like they manufactured the no-win myth for the CPC and the Harper's gloomy/makeover myth...and the various other myths thay sell to MSM lobotomized sheep.
I'm a bit of a late comer to this one, but I'm all for it. Excellent post, you certainly know the legalities of the issue. Make sure the petition comes my way.
Right on! Add my name to your list. Problems: our 'Charter of Rights and Freedoms' is a document that was written by and for lawyers. The federal government can interpret this any way they want to, and if you want to contest it in a court of law, you can hire a lawyer to do that,(who can then contest it with a government-appointed lawyer, (who will be paid with YOUR tax money!)
Geddit- you are actually paying the wages of the people who are defending the rights of the government to DENY YOUR RIGHTS!
These very same Lawyers, are the ones who your taxes are paying, to defend the rights of the government to defraud you!
WLM, why warm it?
While suggestions are made about how we can get rid of that blight on democracy called the liberal party of Canada they continue to prove over and again how complete bereft of any shame they are.
CBC reports that the RCMP is investigating Grewal for 'irregularities' in donations to Grewal which were supposed to have been turned over to the Conservative party but were 'cashed by Mr. Grewal' and those contributing were told to 'make out the check to Mr. Grewal'... the amounts appear to be $600.00 each and another for $1000.00. On further scrutiny of the details of the transactions it appears there is some confusion but the CBC certainly does not give that impression. They give the impression that Grewal has committed some crime. They make a point of it actually.
Whether or not any irregularities have occurred is , I would think, up to Grewal and the CPC to determine before any 'RCMP investigation' would be warranted.
The CBC could do quite a bit more with their taxpayer funded time besides sipping lattes and fudging stories. After all they have a wealth of material from Adscam and the plethora of obvious corruption and theivery to last them a hundred years but they focus on a manufactured story about Grewal.
They did a hit piece on the man before the 'airport incident' and the tone was exactly the same:
Grewal got into the country on false pretenses, committed fraud to stay here and has trumped up the tape scandal just to make mischief while the libs run around acting like THEY have the right to govern.
It is absolutely freaking unbelievable and what is even more unbelievable is that we are not absolutely raging about this as an electorate!
Why are we not on the phone, on e-mail... on television riding the liberals and that Martin mini-me Layton right into the oblivion they so richly deserve! ??
Post a Comment
<< Home