The Reformer's Firebrand

*-{The New Canadian Colonist's Advocate }-* A commentary of fiery reformist sentiment from the spirit of it's 210 year old Canadian ghost publisher patron. This will be a home to the new wave of anti-partisan advocacy for defeating Canada's second "family compact" and reinstallation of responsible governance in this 21st century new Canadian democratic dominion.

Friday, December 09, 2005

Another failed Liberal gun policy

With Martin talkin tough on crime by acting tyrannical against lawful firearms owners, we see the same old liberal misdirect brought out to impress the city rubes in TO. My God!!... does this hollow rhetoric really sell? Are Torontonians really this unsophisticated?

Here's a book on the uslessness of spending money on oppressing lawful citizens in the false promise of effecting criminals. I wish the Martinites had read it, but then again their hidden agenda is not really driven by reason or fairness.

As for myself, all I have to say to dictator Martin is I will comply with no unjustified claim on my legally owned and paid for private property...others may demand legal compensation to surrender their property to capricious state legislating but I am not one of them....I prefer to expose your real anti-constitutional agenda.

If you think the registry boondoggle was a 2billion dollar fraud wait til you see the bill for having to buy back a couple million legal firearms from their owners at an average of $1000 each....a conservative estimate is about 32 billion I don't think PM Dithers can justify that expense for the non problem legal firearms owners represent while health care goes unfunded to the point where people wait 6 months for operations....his priorities are as wickedly confused as his sense of fairness.

So frig you and your bans of private legally owned property Dithers, you will never have a chance to steal again before you are tossed from office and indicted for your criminal frauds.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

This policy will never take effect even if the Liberals are re-elected. Martin will leave it up to the provinces to implement the ban, the provinces will say No, and martin will be off the hook, having once again hoodwinked the sheep from Ontario.

December 9, 2005 at 2:27 PM  
Anonymous KM said...

That isn't the point. The point is that he proposed it at all. Judging from election promises, pre-election promises, and the Liberal record, Martin seems to have the ambition to become a communist dictator and he has already prosposed the first serious step - banning guns from the hands of law-abiding citizens.

December 9, 2005 at 2:39 PM  
Blogger NL-ExPatriate said...

Prediction by Sue Dyer Knight on VOCM open line.

The election will be East and West versus Ontario. The Bloc is in their own little world and won't be a factor.

If the Lieberals win it will be more nation destroying to benefit Ontario and continue to utilize the rest of the provinces as colonies.

If the Conservatives win they will build a stronger and more diverse country outside of Ontario.

Since Ontario has over 1/3 of the available seats with 106 of 308 they are the country at least from a political perspective.

Democratic deficit my god it's more like Democratic communism ruled out of Ontario and from Ottawa.

December 9, 2005 at 5:03 PM  
Blogger W.L. Mackenzie Redux said...

Anonymous said...
This policy will never take effect even if the Liberals are re-elected

I've seen thes bastards work up close for over 12 years ...I'm taking it as an open threat. Even if Martin never has a chance to do this when he's whipped at the polls...I'm taking it's an open declaration of war by a tyrant who wants to bureaucratically terrorize and repress an identifyable law abiding social minority in this nation. He has openly declared himself to be an anti constitutionalist and a tyrant...From this day forward "tyrant" Martin will have to be "lucky" to escape the political and legal wrath of those he has attacked.

December 10, 2005 at 1:34 PM  
Anonymous Shawn said...

Don't worry about the cost of compensating owners, they will merely seize the property without compensation via the Arthurson precedent.

December 12, 2005 at 6:56 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home