The Reformer's Firebrand

*-{The New Canadian Colonist's Advocate }-* A commentary of fiery reformist sentiment from the spirit of it's 210 year old Canadian ghost publisher patron. This will be a home to the new wave of anti-partisan advocacy for defeating Canada's second "family compact" and reinstallation of responsible governance in this 21st century new Canadian democratic dominion.

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Why I won't Hunt with Dick Cheney

In light of the recent developments it appears to me Cheney was either totally wasted, criminally negligent or attempted murder. The official story is totally concocted. As an upland hunter and 28 ga. scattergun user of many years, I can attest to the fact the damage done the shooting victim was definitely NOT from a 30 yard shot by "mistake" that range I have removed stray pellets that hit the dogs by pinching the skin to pop the 71/2 led pellet out.....for a 28ga. 3/4 oz load of 71/2 pellets propelled by a sub-2 dram powder charge to penetrate a mans tough canvas (blaze orange) hunting coat, ribs, gristle and muscle to lodge a pellet in the heart, and leave a shot pattern about a foot in diameter, the muzzle of that gun had to be closer than 20 feet from the victim.

The bottom line here is we are witness to yet another government cover up and we see that certain politicians are not accountable to the same laws you and I are. Cheney’s story is bogus…..and so obviously bogus anyone with a 20-28 gage shotgun and field loads can confirm it with a simple ballistic test.

As usual the Fed agencies create another magic bullet theory where the scientifically predictable characteristics of projectile ballistics documented in this realm of existence do not apply.

I owned 28s and when I was patterning the gun to see its effective range, when I took it out to 30 yards it made a pattern 45 inches in diameter and would barely penetrate a double cardboard backstop with # 71/2 bird shot.

Why lie this badly? Where is the NRA..surely they should be concerned with the republicans repealing the laws of ballistic physics?....of course if these laws pass as truth it means that if Cheney can damn near kill a man at 30 yards with a 28 ga, field load I can down a bear with a .22 rimfire. ;-)

Update: Some ballistic authorities confim my suspicions.

Latest update: From a site hosting the scientific ballistic demonstration that proves Cheney is lying... a video...which profesional hackers tried to wipe from the server 3 times. The Feds do not want you to see this simple proof which incriminates Cheney in a conspiricy to cover up a felony.


Blogger Onanite said...

Cheney just wanted to shoot someone, for himself. Sick bastard.


February 15, 2006 at 1:17 PM  
Blogger Aizlynne said...

I hadn't a clue about that Bill because I don't hunt or possess guns of any kind.

That being said, this isn't very funny if it is true. But then again, why the heck would you shoot your friend - unless you wanted too. It doesn't appear to be the case according to the guy that was shot ... or so the press is attesting to.

Maybe that is why they are all over this story. I thought it must have been a slow news day in the US, but maybe not if what you are telling us is correct Bill.

February 15, 2006 at 1:20 PM  
Blogger W.L. Mackenzie Redux said...

Sorry Onanite, as much as this may make for a great Hollywood plot, or give leftiods a wet dream, I don't think Cheney is a murderer.

He's a slob of a hunter and a disgrace to those of us who do hunt....and he's a elitist snot nosed politician who lies and gets Fed agencies to back the lie, when he gets his tail in a vice.

That's what pisses me....regardless of your partisanism you know damn right that skanks like Klintoon, Gore, Rummy or Toastmaster Ted Kennedy would do exactly the same thing.

At the end of the day what we have left is an "US" 'n "Them" scenario....those who are oppressed by the state's micro managing laws and those above it.

February 15, 2006 at 1:49 PM  
Blogger W.L. Mackenzie Redux said...

Aiz: I'm not saying Cheney intentionally shot the guy....I'm saying he was probably dangerously inept as a hunter...or boozed to the tits or both and he made a near fatal mistake...Then HE LIED ABOUT IT. I think he made the story up and waited all that time to get to the press because he was drunk and needed time to get the victim, the cops and whitehouse spinn team all on the same page...and to sober up.

Bottom line is if I did what he did I'd be charged....he wasn't.

February 15, 2006 at 1:55 PM  
Blogger Les Mackenzie said...

Where was Cheney the day Kennedy was shot?

February 16, 2006 at 11:06 AM  
Blogger Aizlynne said...

I am starting to think he was probably boozed up Bill, like you said earlier.

Otherwise, why the delay? To sober up perhaps?

February 16, 2006 at 6:29 PM  
Blogger Canadian Sentinel said...

You know, Wil, the Cheney incident really doesn't interest me that much. I guess it was just a bunch of old farts being old farts and getting themselves hurt.

What concerns me is that Libranoesque deal to sell some US ports to a UAE firm with ties to Al Qaeda. I'm like, WTF is going on there? That's like something the Cretch or Dithers would do; not a Republican president.

I cannot see any value in this deal. And as puzzling is the administration's so far not trying to sell the whole thing to Americans. Why are they doing it?

Granted, some recent appointments made by our Tories have puzzled me, but they now pale in comparison to this port-sale deal in the US.

Whaddya think of that? You're the Yankee dude here.

February 17, 2006 at 4:58 PM  
Blogger W.L. Mackenzie Redux said...

Les Mackenzie said...
Where was Cheney the day Kennedy was shot?"

Coincidentally enough he was in Wyoming urging his dad to pull his GOP party strings to get him off a second drunk driving charge...who sez Ted Kennedy and Cheney gon't have common ground. ;-)

May 5, 2006 at 12:48 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home